Mel and I have both been very apathetic about our blog lately. Maybe it's because our life is so exciting. Maybe it's because we're lazy. Maybe it's because our Mac died.
(Warning: Entering Blasting Zone. For those of you who have heard my "Mac tirade", you can skip down to where it says "End of tirade")
I have had mucho experience with 2 Macs now, and I am less than impressed. My first Mac I bought in 2003, the iMac. I had heard from a trusted buddy that Macs were faster, better, and in all ways superior to PCs. Well, they'd better be, judging from the price tag. I fell for it, and I bought one. I remember opening up Safari for the first time. It wasn't faster than IE at all. Then some of my programs, like iMovie, GarageBand, and ProTools, froze constantly. I frequently lost hours of work because of this. Is it my fault for not saving often enough? Maybe, but you can't blame me when saving takes like 3 minutes, which is CENTURIES in computer time.
Mel bought a MacBook a couple of years ago. We've been using it mostly for photo storage, Internet browsing, and so forth. It plugged along pretty well, and Mel was always diligent about downloading the most recent updates that Mac throws out pretty much on the hour. However, iPhoto has never really worked well. It always froze up the computer and required a hard reset. We've been using Kodak PhotoShare instead, and that's been a pretty good application for photos.
A few months ago, it started crashing when we were using Firefox. Okay, let's use Safari. Same result. You couldn't use the computer for more than 30 minutes before it would crash. We backed up all our pictures in case it died. Finally, in July, it died. It would try to boot up but it would fail every time and I couldn't even get to the desktop. I was about to take it to the Apple Store to see if the "geniuses" could help me, but I decided to look up the problem. The solution was to reinstall the OS. So I did that, and it worked. It's up and running again. We'll see how long that lasts.
Now this whole spiel wasn't to say that PCs are BETTER than Macs. We all know that PCs have their share of problems. In fact, computers, Mac or PC, will ALWAYS have problems and bugs because there are simply too many things that can go wrong with these complex operating systems. That's why those Mac commercials bug me so bad. "Oh, we've never EVER had a problem!" they pretty much say.
What I'm saying is that PCs are a better buy. You get more for your money. Both PCs and Macs will diminish in performance (in my experience, the Macs diminished faster, but maybe I'm just not cool enough) as time goes by, so you might as well spend less money. Spend some good money on a ridiculously capacious external hard drive so you can back up your precious files and move them over to your new computer you'll have to buy every few years.
That said, I'm still considering a Mac for my next purchase. Why? Because I have a ton of files in a Mac-only format and I will always have a PC for work. I would rather spend a few hundred dollars than hours upon hours converting those files into universally accepted files. Of course, if I wouldn't have ever bought the Mac, I wouldn't have this problem. But also, did PCs have the capability and software to run ProTools and such back in 2003? I'm not too sure, but I don't think so. PCs have come a long way in the last few years to be able to compete with Macs. Competition is a good thing, because without the PC/Mac battle, computers wouldn't improve at such a high rate.
End of Tirade
Okay, so that's why I haven't blogged in a while. You'll start to see many more picture-laden posts in the near future, and maybe some Terrence episodes if my ego gets stroked enough. This first one is my trip to Cleveland with Baldwin.
Baldwin is a huge Cincinatti Reds fan, in every meaning of the phrase. I have never seen anybody so faithful to a crappy team, it's quite impressive, and I hope that I am still a loyal Cards fan when they are 0-162. He was desperate to get away for a few days to watch his beloved Reds play. So he called me and asked me if I wanted to go. Since our last baseball trek was to Arizona to watch the D-Backs play the Reds, I suggested that I didn't really want to go to a Reds series unless the Cardinals, and more specifically Albert Pujols, were involved. As many of you know, I have a tremendous man-crush on Albert.
Anyway, none of the Reds-Cards series were at convenient times, so Baldwin gave in and we decided to go to a Indians-Cards series in Cleveland. This was also influenced by my quest to see all 30 of the MLB franchises at their home field. Below I have ranked the stadiums based on my personal preferences (ticket prices, parking, comfort, fan demeanor, ease of sneaking down, stadium aesthetics). Obviously, I am biased, and I think that old stadiums are overrated. They are like old houses: Cool to look at, uncomfortable to live in, and way too small.
1. St. Louis (4 games, 2 Albert homers)
2. Florida (3 games, 1 Albert homer)
3. Toronto (1 game, 1 Albert homer)
4. LA (1 game)
5. Cleveland (2 games, 3 Albert homers)
6. Texas (1 game)
7. Warshington (1 game)
8. Milwaukee (1 game)
9. San Diego (4 games, 1 Albert homer)
10. Arizona (3 games)
11. Anaheim (1 game)
12. Atlanta (1 game)
13. San Francisco (1 game)
14. Mets (1 game)
15. Philly (1 game, 2 Albert homers)
16. Red Sox (3 games)
17. Yankees (1 game vs the Red Sox no less. And the Yankees lost!! Good times.)
18. Cubs (5 games, no Albert homers! He was 1-13 in a 4-game series)
Notable chokes:
1. Baltimore: All the Hansen boys went all the way to Camden but it was sold out. (Hey Dad, haven't you ever heard of scalped tickets?)
2. Oakland: A bunch of cousins went to a game during the family reunion in the Sierras, but I was too interested in swimming
3. Houston: I was there for one night a month ago, but I had woken up at 4:30 AM two mornings in a row and wouldn't have been able to stay awake, but I certainly had the chance.
Anyway, we went to Cleveland. Here are some pics:
We went golfing not once, not thrice, but twice. Considering I hadn't gone in over 2 years, I did pretty well. Baldwin's a lot better than me, though, and walloped me good.
Baldwin putting. We shared a foursome with 2 oldies who schooled us both. Well, the old dude did, not so much his wife who couldn't hit it more than 50 yards. Don't worry, I talked plenty of smack in her direction.
Maybe it's because I grew up near Geneva Steel, maybe it's because I served in the "Triangle of Death" industrial region of Poland for over a year, maybe it's because I live in an old shoe-factory town, but I love old industrial centers and other pictures like this.
It was Shin-soo Choo bobblehead day on Saturday, that's what I'm holding there. Also, Lebron James plays basketball in Cleveland, I think.
No, my hairline's not receding, why do you ask?
We were treated to a fireworks show after the first game. All for no extra charge!
This is Baldwin, who may look retarded in this picture because he IS retarded. I met him at the Special Olympics and he's been my project ever since.
In summary, White Cheddar Cheez-its are the BEST CRACKERS OF ALL TIME.
7 comments:
Sorry about your Mac trouble.
Glad you are blogging again.
Now . . .
Terrence
Terrence
Terrence
(How's that for ego stroking?)
nice swing. i want to go play after work now
Heard the tirade, skipped this tirade. And seriously I remember being VERY disappointed to not be able to attend my first major League baseball game in Baltimore. That drive for nuthin.
I think the white cheddar cheez-its taste weird. It's like a surprise every time I eat one, even if I've been eating them for several minutes in a row.
My work computer is one of those really 'nice' macs and I took a mac mini home too... they really aren't that much better... at first maybe, but my office mac has been stalling up a lot lately... and much like you were describing, because I didn't save regularly enough I lost a few pages off of an assignment a couple weeks ago. stupid mac.
Retarded... yes, unfortunately, I do look a little retarded. But at least I beat you in the softball throw in the special olympics Kent.
For me:
at the top, old Riverfront Stadium... only because it is the stadium of my youth... (15 games or so)
The others...
1. Arizona (five games)
2. Colorado (Two games)
3. Cleveland (Two games)
4. LA Dodgers (two games)
St Louis, drove 80 miles out of my way to get to a sold out Reds/Cardinals game and be turned away.
Cincinnati, was in Cincy while the Reds were out of town. Got to the tour desk just in time for him to tell me they left 10 minutes before on the last tour of the day.
Boston, Thought the outside of Fenway looked pretty crappy. Didn't want to pay $50 each for a tour.
Kansas City, saw from the Freeway.
:)
I don't take blog apathy lightly, especially from you. For days now (even weeks, maybe) I've been checking your blog and feeling my blood start to boil every time I read "don't call it a comeback" at the top. You can imagine my delight at having TWO NEW POSTS to read this time. Happy camper here. Unfortunately, I don't have much to say about either post. Love my mac. Never been to Cleveland. Never use tools, or really have a need for them. SO, I think it's safe to say I don't really relate. BUT that doesn't mean I didn't enjoy reading. I'll be anticipating the picture posts....
I'll just stick with my laptop I got for my birthday until I'm forced to buy a new computer. Then, I'll consult Coleslaw when I do. He seems to know a little about computers...okay, a lot.
1. LA Dodgers (yes, biased)
2. Camden Yards (yes, I got in)
3. SF Giants-the new one (can't believe you ranked it this low)
4. NY Mets - Shea. Underrated, I think.
5. Texas - the new one
6. Atlanta - the old one
7. Texas - Arlington (the old one)
8. Cincy - Riverfront
9. Oakland Colloseum
10. SF - Candlestick. Unbelievably crappy, but still better than
11. Seattle - Kingdome
Post a Comment